It was a whirlwind trip in every sense of the term. The drive down was through beautiful but wintry (and occasionally treacherous) weather. I rushed about from place to place while in DC. And left right after the meeting with my advisor so as to get back to Syracuse and finish my thesis and return my Mom’s car to her. (We are expecting another storm tonight with some heavy snows by the weekend.)
I got there on Saturday and met my friend Joanne and we spent almost two hours checking out the new Ocean Hall at the Natural History museum. It is an object-rich exhibit with lots of explanatory text written in a straight-forward, friendly, almost-conversational tone. This new approach to interpretation was pleasing to both of us and is much better than the Smithsonian’s traditional approach to object labels which usually involves providing bland statistics about an object (what, when, where, how, size). Joanne even noticed they used the term “evolved” in a label explaining how an animal’s feature had changed over time. Score: Scientists 1 , Religious Wackos 0. We didn’t get to see all of the exhibit but I was impressed with what I did see. They had lots of objects with good individual and collective interpretation for the objects combined with a smattering of media to enhance the object-focused textual descriptions. I hate it when museums use media to supplant text-based object narrative. Unless you have someone on video holding and talking about the specific object on display, words on an object label or reader-rail will always have more immediacy and impact than any video. (In my humble opinion, of course.)
I had tentative plans to get folks together for dinner but everyone had to cancel for one reason or another. The one person who didn’t cancel was my buddy Damian and it turns out he was alone that night as his wife was at the ballet. So, in a happy strange way it worked out perfectly that everyone canceled as Damian and I had a guys night out. We sat around and talked about work—We used to work together and he always fills in me on the latest news and/or gossip with my former co-workers—and went out for good barbecue, talked about the inauguration, and watched a stupid Will Ferrell movie (Anchorman) on TV when we got back to his place. Pretty much a perfect guys night out.
Sunday I had brunch with my friend Allison* W. and talked about her work—She is another friend from my time at the Smithsonian—and her singing endeavors. She sings in one professional chorus and had just come from an audition for a second amateur chorus. She was all excited as her audition went well and she was able to cover a two-and-a-half octave range in her singing for the audition. We also talked a good bit about the new Ocean Hall exhibit and its new approach to educational and interpretative techniques. (It’s hard for people like us to just go to a museum and enjoy it for a purely aesthetic or pleasurable reason.)
Then I was off to GW’s Gelman Library for 8 hours of not very productive writing on the extra section to my thesis asked for by my advisor. I wrote three good paragraphs for my thesis and many bad paragraphs which were all crap and got deleted before the meeting with my advisor yesterday. The meeting was helpful though as I got specifics from my advisor about what she wants me to address in the extra section and we talked about where to put it in the paper as well as possible ways of integrating it with my existing conclusion. So, I should be able to get the extra section written and to her for review by Thursday. And then I am finished with the thesis and can focus all my energies on looking for work again.
*I have three friends named Allison through my work at the Smithsonian. I met them all when I was working at the American History museum. Allison W. was literally the first person I ever met at the Smithsonian and, apart from her time at graduate school, is a Smithsonian lifer currently at the Postal Museum. Allison R. was at American history only for a short time but is still in the museum field at a regional art/history museum in Tennessee. Alison D. (note the single “l”) is still in the DC area but left the Smithsonian to work in the museum studies program at George Washington University.
— — — — —
For those of you statistically inclined, I was gone for just about 65 hours, with slightly less than 16 of those hours (25% of the total time I was gone) spent just driving to and from DC. If you take into account driving around DC to visit various friends and the trip up to Baltimore to see/stay with my buddy Eric, I spent another 5 hours in the car driving (bring my total trip time spent in the car p to about 32%). Total miles driven were 877.7. I forgot to reset the mpg meter in my Mom’s car before I left so I couldn’t calculate what my mpg were for this trip. But, with the slow highway driving—I rarely ever got over 60 mph because of the weather, let alone reached the speed limit of 65 mph—I am guessing it was in the high 20s again. My last trip to DC in my Mom’s car I got ~29 mpg and that was going 60-65 mph the whole way.
Another Reason Why Religion Sucks
So, on the BBC News website today there is an article about why the Pope sees humanity threatened by homosexuality and transsexuality.* The Pope talks about needing an “ecology of the human being, understood in the proper manner”. Well, their proper manner of understanding sees any type of human relationship outside of male-female unions as leading to “self-destruction” of humanity. Bullshit! What happened to the message of love, charity, and compassion we find in the gospels? I guess those are good traits to have until being loving, compassionate, and charitable conflict with other man-made beliefs of the Church.
Logical inconsistencies like this are why I find all organized religions to be a waste of time. I know that the intellectual framework for religious thought must differ from the intellectual framework for other types of thought (scientific, rational, philosophical, etc.) but when the intellectual framework for religious thought can’t even have logical consistency internal to itself I just have to say “Why bother?” You know what would be nice, a religious movement that treated its adherents as complex, thoughtful beings as opposed to an agglomeration of specific traits like race, gender, sex.
Who cares if a person is attracted to someone of the same sex. Is that really more important than what kind of person they are? than how they treat their family, friends and strangers? Is a person’s sexual orientation a more significant factor in defining an identity than the extent of their commitment to living a generous, compassionate life? Seriously, who cares if a person is gay. I don’t. When I meet someone I care more about their personality than who they have sex with. I am going to be much more bothered by someone I meet who is loud and obnoxious than someone who is gay. If you’re gay, that manifests itself in just one part of your identity, but if you’re loud and obnoxious that manifests itself in every part of your identity.
And if I have to deal with someone being loud and obnoxious that just makes me want to call them stupid and punch them in the head. And I don’t like having to think about telling people they are stupid or fighting the urge to punch someone in the head.
*You can go here on the Vatican website to see the English translation of the original Italian.
(I don’t know which to trust less, religious groups or the press that reports on religious groups.)